Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Linkedin button Webonews button Delicious button Digg button Flickr button Stumbleupon button Newsvine button Youtube button
" />

Health

Why I’m off for some vitamin D – until the sun comes out

February 7, 2012

sun 007 Why Im off for some vitamin D – until the sun comes out

There’s has always been discussion on the pros and cons of vitamin supplementation in our diets. I see no harm in taking vitamin D and other supplements as long one stays within the normal dosage recommedated by physicians and FDA guidelines. Usually common sense dictates following the instructions listed on the bottle or physician’s orders. Never decide to begin ingesting supplements until your have discussed doing so with your family doctor first.  Vitamin D is an important vitamin from strong bones,growth, and for many chemical reactions that occur within our bodies. Moderation is the key to absorbing sufficient Vitamin D. As for sunshine….be careful not be burn ..wear sunscreen protection…

http://www.yepod.com/?p=31666

That’s my comment…pass it on…

Dr Anthony


poweredbyguardianREV Why Im off for some vitamin D – until the sun comes outThis article titled “Why I’m off for some vitamin D – until the sun comes out” was written by Ann Robinson, for guardian.co.uk on Thursday 26th January 2012 18.14 UTC

Vitamin D is in the news again, and while the experts squabble over it, I’m off to buy myself some supplements. The chief medical officer for England has told GPs like me to advise those at risk to take supplements. And since half the adult population of the UK is lacking vitamin D in the winter months and deficiency is being linked to a growing list of health problems, I can’t see a good reason not to take a small multivitamin a day – at least until the sun comes out. I’ll stick to the recommended daily amount as you can have too much of a good thing, even vitamins.

Vitamin D is essential for bone growth and health, and deficiency can cause rickets in the young and a condition called chondromalacia in adults. You wouldn’t think rickets still existed in the UK but it probably never went away and is increasingly recognised as a cause of fractures in susceptible children.

Recently two parents, Rohan Wray and Chana al-Alas, were accused of murdering their four-month-old baby who died two years ago from sudden infant death syndrome (Sids, also known as cot death). The baby, Jayden, was found to have multiple injuries and the parents were accused of shaking the baby to death. But pathologist Dr Irene Scheimberg, based at Royal London Hospital, found evidence of rickets in Jayden at postmortem and the judge directed the jury to acquit.

Since that tragic case, Scheimberg says she has discovered vitamin D deficiency in eight further cases of Sids and in 30 cases of children who have died of various causes and had postmortems. A colleague of hers, Dr Marta Cohen, working in Yorkshire has also found vitamin D deficiency in 18 out of 24 cases of Sids and in 45 babies under the age of one, who died of other causes. Both doctors are calling for further investigation into the implications of vitamin D deficiency and highlighting the need to be aware of rickets in cases of Sids, which can be mistaken for non-accidental injury.

This adds weight to those calling for widespread vitamin D supplementation in the UK. Advice from the chief medical officer for England, Sally Davies, was for at-risk groups – which includes pregnant and breastfeeding women, children aged six months to five years old, people aged 65 or over, people who are not exposed to much sun (the housebound, those who cover up their skin for cultural reasons and people who have darker skin, whose bodies are unable to produce vitamin D as easily) – to take vitamin D. But there have been calls to introduce supplements for all the population in Scotland, because of high levels of multiple sclerosis which may be linked to vitamin D deficiency. Ryan McLaughlin, 13, launched a campaign, Shine on Scotland, in response to his mother’s diagnosis of MS, while Professor George Ebers of the Nuffield department of clinical neurosciences at Oxford University believes the evidence is now good enough to justify dosing the entire population with vitamin D. Professor George Ebers of the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences at Oxford University is quoted, saying that he believes the evidence is now good enough to justify dosing the entire population with vitamin D. Last month, his team published evidence of a link between MS and an inherited tendency that leads to vitamin D deficiency.

Scotland’s chief medical officer, however, Sir Harry Burns, says in the same article he thinks there needs to be “broader scientific consensus” before change is considered. He warns that dietary supplements can cause harm and that we need to wait for good randomised studies in large populations. He wants to wait for the conclusions of a review of the evidence by the UK government’s scientific advisory committee on nutrition in 2014.

But Ebers says that is too long. He reflects that there was evidence to support recommending folic acid supplementation for all pregnant women to prevent problems like spina bifida, many years before the public health authorities backed it.

Bruce Hollis, professor of paediatrics and biochemistry at the Medical University of South Carolina, agrees, insisting there’s no point waiting for a large randomised trial because it’s unlikely to ever happen. He says it would be hard to attract funding for an expensive, large scale trial as drug companies would be unlikely to make a profit on cheap vitamin supplements.

The best source of vitamin D is sunlight on the skin. Vitamin D is also found in a small number of foods (oily fish, eggs, cheese and meat) but it is difficult to get enough vitamin D from diet alone. In the UK, all margarines and infant formula milks are already fortified with vitamin D and it is also added, in small amounts, to other foods such as breakfast cereals, soya and some dairy products,. Breastfeeding mothers need adequate vitamin D levels of their own to ensure their babies get enough.

You can buy single vitamin D supplements at most pharmacies and supermarkets. Pregnant women who take vitamin D as part of a multivitamin should avoid supplements containing vitamin A (retinol), which can be harmful in pregnancy.

While the experts continue to debate, we may all be well advised to take a daily vitamin D supplement and expose our skin to whatever weak winter sunshine we can.

 Why Im off for some vitamin D – until the sun comes out

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Fighting malaria with one hand tied back

February 3, 2012

Mosquitos on a net 007 Fighting malaria with one hand tied back

It’s more often than not that mortality figures are under-estimated or lower than reported…are you really surprise? Malaria is a serious disease…  No matter how strong you may think you are…your immunity to malaria may not be enough to succumb to the disease. How long will the insecticides to effective in keeping the populations of mosquitoes at bay?….well until they develop a resistance to the chemicals we are using…..there’s got to be a more natural approach in curbing the over-population of these blood sucking critters..! Any ideas out there…share it with us…

http://www.yepod.com/?p=31177

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

Yepod.com  


poweredbyguardianREV Fighting malaria with one hand tied backThis article titled “Fighting malaria with one hand tied back” was written by Sarah Boseley, health editor, for The Guardian on Friday 3rd February 2012 06.29 UTC

Decades of assumptions about the lethality of malaria have been overturned by the publication of a paper in the Lancet from an academic institute in Seattle which says the disease kills twice as many as everybody thought. Even more extraordinary – it would seem that conventional wisdom about the disease has been wrong all this time.

It does not just kill babies and children under five — it kills adults too, in nearly as large proportions.

The Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation has astounded the global health community by claiming it has been fighting malaria apparently with one hand behind its back. The death toll has come down since 2004, thanks to huge efforts to get insecticide-impregnated bednets to households and treat those who are sick with better drugs, but all the while an older age group has been neglected.

“These are certainly results which surprised us when we first did the analysis,” said Steve Lim, one of the authors of the Lancet paper. “It is new to what is taught in public health and medical school, which is that when kids are exposed to malaria at a very young age, it conveys immunity.”

Only last year the World Malaria Report gave mortality figures which are half those the institute has found – 655,000 deaths compared to 1.2 million. It is an extraordinary gulf and there will be lots of debate about the statistical methods used by the Seattle team.

But the institute has form. This is part of a five-year project, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to obtain the best possible data for the toll of death and disease from vario

How to tell if your olive oil is the real thing

January 10, 2012

VIRGIN OLIVE OIL FACTORY  007 How to tell if your olive oil is the real thing

My friend Donika Llace, a medical office administrator in Chicago is always telling me about the benefits of olive oil, She claims to taking two tablespoons of olive oil daily as a supplement to her regular daily diet. In fact, she is not alone in thinking that the benefits of olive oil go far beyond the kitchen. Many in Europe, as in Italy and Albania feel that olive oil can prevent cardiovascular disease,constipation,arthritis, or  many  of  the common ailments experience by patients. So why not give it a try? It’s a natural approach to natural living…Donika Llace suggests “talking to your family physician before taking any supplements”.

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony         


poweredbyguardianREV How to tell if your olive oil is the real thingThis article titled “How to tell if your olive oil is the real thing” was written by Jon Henley, for The Guardian on Wednesday 4th January 2012 19.59 UTC

Last month, the Olive Oil Times reported that two Spanish businessmen had been sentenced to two years in prison in Cordoba for selling hundreds of thousands of litres of supposedly extra virgin olive oil that was, in fact, a mixture of 70-80% sunflower oil and 20-30% olive.

In 2008, Italian police arrested over 60 people and closed more than 90 farms and processing plants across the south after uncovering substandard, non-Italian olive oil being passed off as Italian extra virgin, and chlorophyll and beta-carotene being added to sunflower and soybean oil with the same aim.

Most alarmingly, a study last year by researchers at the University of California, Davis and the Australian Oils Research Laboratory concluded that as much as 69% of imported European olive oil (and a far smaller proportion of native Californian) sold as extra virgin in the delicatessens and grocery stores on the US west coast wasn’t what it claimed to be.

In Britain, of course, it wasn’t so very long ago that the most likely place to find olive oil was the chemist. Today, thanks partly to the health claims made on its behalf and partly to the fact it tastes good, the oil Homer called “liquid gold” is in half of all UK homes and we get through 30m litres of olive oil every year – more than double than we did decade ago. We’re now, in fact, the world’s 10th biggest olive oil-consuming nation. So with a litre of supermarket extra virgin costing up to £4, and connoisseurs willing to pay 10 times that sum for a far smaller bottle of seasonal, first cold stone pressed, single estate, artisan-milled oil from Italy or Greece, can we be sure of getting what we’re paying for?

The answer, according to Tom Mueller in a book out this month, is very often not. In Extra Virginity: the Sublime and Scandalous World of Olive Oil, Mueller, an American who lives in Italy, lays bare the workings of an industry prey, he argues, to hi-tech, industrial-scale fraud. The problem, he says, is that good olive oil is difficult, time-consuming and expensive to make, but easy, quick and cheap to doctor.

Most commonly, it seems, extra virgin oil is mixed with a lower grade olive oil, often not from the same country. Sometimes, another vegetable oil such as colza or canola is used. The resulting blend is then chemically coloured, flavoured and deodorised, and sold as extra-virgin to a producer. Almost any brand can, in theory, be susceptible: major names such as Bertolli (owned by Unilever) have found themselves in court having to argue, successfully in this instance, that they had themselves been defrauded by their supplier.

Meanwhile, the chemical tests that should by law be performed by exporters of extra virgin oil before it can be labelled and sold as such can often fail to detect adulterated oil, particularly when it has been mixed with products such as deodorised, lower-grade olive oil in a sophisticated modern refinery. Nor do national food authorities appear particularly bothered as long as the oil isn’t actively harmful, which is rare. In Britain, says Judy Ridgeway, one of the UK’s leading olive oil experts, the Food Standards Agency has not done any checks on olive oil in five or six years. “And it only does chemical tests, not taste tests,” she adds.

The EU now also requires extra virgin oil to pass assorted taste and aroma tests, assessed by panels of experts: the oil has to be suitably fruity, bitter and peppery, and cannot display any of 16 different defects, including “grubbiness”, “mustiness” and “fustiness”. But bad stuff still gets through.

Ridgeway says it is “hard to say what percentage of faulty oil gets through” to Britain. “It will vary seasonally – there will be more at this time of year than in March or April, but it’s appreciable. They buy in good faith, but there are faulty oils on our supermarket shelves, without any argument.”

The olive, in more than 700 varieties or cultivars, has been grown for its oil in the Mediterranean since 3000 BC. Unlike most vegetable oils, which are extracted from seeds or nuts, good olive oil is made using a basic hydraulic press, or more modern centrifuge, so it is more a fruit juice than an industrial fat. It comes in several qualities, including lampante, or “lamp oil”, which is made from damaged or ground-gathered fruit and cannot be sold as food; virgin; and extra virgin, the highest grade. This has to be made by a physical (rather than chemical) process, and meet strict chemical requirements, including levels of oxidation and “free acidity” (a measure of decomposition).

Like any fresh product, olive oil deteriorates over time. “The trouble,” says Ridgeway, “is that it’s quite easy to clean up, say, an oil that doesn’t quite pass the acidity test, and to do it without leaving any chemical markers. It could even taste pretty good, for about three months. Then it will go horribly wrong.”

Michael North, an expert who runs a fresh seasonal olive oil club, says the problem is “huge. The public are just not aware of what’s going on. There’s plenty of oil out there that’s rubbish: last year’s oil or older. Or not even olive oil.”So how can consumers best ensure they’re not being ripped off? Ridgeway recommends paying a sensible price. Unfortunately, a 50cl bottle costing £15 is, on balance, “less likely to have problems” than one costing £2. North urges people never to buy olive oil in a clear bottle (“It oxidises and goes rancid far faster”), and to buy from somewhere you can taste it first.

Both he and Ridegway, though, stress the prime importance of buying young. “Look for a harvest date,” North says. “They’re starting to appear now, albeit on only a few bottles, and they’ll tell you how old the oil is. It’s not an absolute guarantee of quality, but half the battle.”

How to buy olive oil

• Find a seller who stores it in clean, temperature-controlled stainless steel containers topped with an inert gas such as nitrogen to keep oxygen at bay, and bottles it as they sell it. Ask to taste it before buying.

• Favour bottles or containers that protect against light, and buy a quantity that you’ll use up quickly.

• Don’t worry about colour. Good oils come in all shades, from green to gold to pale straw – but avoid flavours such as mouldy, cooked, greasy, meaty, metallic, and cardboard.

• Ensure that your oil is labelled “extra virgin,” since other categories—”pure” or “light” oil, “olive oil” and “olive pomace oil” – have undergone chemical refinement.

• Try to buy oils only from this year’s harvest – look for bottles with a date of harvest. Failing that, look at the “best by” date which should be two years after an oil was bottled.

• Though not always a guarantee of quality, PDO (protected designation of origin) and PGI (protected geographical indication) status should inspire some confidence.

• Some terms commonly used on olive oil labels are anachronistic, such as “first pressed” and “cold pressed”. Since most extra virgin oil nowadays is made with centrifuges, it isn’t “pressed” at all, and true extra virgin oil comes exclusively from the first processing of the olive paste.

For further information, see extravirginity.com. Extracted from Extra Virginity: The Sublime and Scandalous World of Olive Oil by Tom Mueller.

 How to tell if your olive oil is the real thing

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Rapper Heavy D died from pulmonary embolism caused by DVT

December 29, 2011

Dwight Arrington Myers ak 006 Rapper Heavy D died from pulmonary embolism caused by DVT

Deep vein thrombosis is primarily a blood clot in a deep vein…think of a blood clot as a piece of tissue in your vein…it shouldn’t be there …but it is..now if it dislodges from its location, it becomes a piece of scab traveling in your vein and if it travels to the lungs…it becomes known as a pulmonary embolism. In either case, a very serious condition requiring emergency medical care. Certain diseases,life choices, trauma,infection,hospilizations,or pregnancy can increase the risks of deep vein thrombosis(DVT). So ask your family physician if you are at risk!

Pass it on and save a life…

http://www.yepod.com/?p=25541

Dr Anthony

Yepod.com   


poweredbyguardianREV Rapper Heavy D died from pulmonary embolism caused by DVTThis article titled “Rapper Heavy D died from pulmonary embolism caused by DVT” was written by Sean Michaels, for guardian.co.uk on Thursday 29th December 2011 10.57 UTC

The sudden death of Heavy D was down to a pulmonary embolism caused by deep vein thrombosis, coroners have announced. The rapper was killed by a blood clot that probably formed in his leg during a flight from London to Los Angeles, and which made its way fatally to his lung.

Although Heavy D’s autopsy was initially inconclusive, the Los Angeles county department of coroner have now completed their investigation into the 44-year-old’s cause of death. When Heavy D was found outside his home on 8 November, collapsed but conscious, the clot in his lungs was likely restricting blood flow and putting severe pressure on his heart. He died at Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre.

Heavy D’s flight “is the connection”, Craig Harvey, chief coroner investigator, told the New York Daily News. “He had reportedly been in London for about six weeks and had returned to LA within the preceding week or so.” The 344lb (26 stone) rapper was found to have deep leg vein thrombosis, pointing to the formation of a clot during the long flight. Air travel, as well as obesity, are common causes of thrombosis.

A pulmonary embolism occurs when a blood clot formed in another part of the body migrates to the lungs and blocks an artery.

Despite early reports, pneumonia has been ruled out as a cause of death. So have drugs, despite a toxicology report that found medication in Heavy D’s system. “He was treating himself with cough syrup,” Harvey told the LA Times, “but it was not contributory.”

Born Dwight Arrington Myers, Heavy D was one of hip-hop’s leading voices in the late 80s and 90s. As leader of Heavy D & the Boyz, he released five top 40 albums in the US and the international hit single Now That We Found Love in 1991. Before returning to the stage in October 2011, Heavy D had not performed live in 15 years.

 Rapper Heavy D died from pulmonary embolism caused by DVT

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Patients should have online access to medical records, says report

December 23, 2011

Woman filing medical reco 007 Patients should have online access to medical records, says report

Patients having access to their medical sounds like a good idea…as long as they attempt to use it to educate themselves and generate questions to ask their doctors. I support this idea 100 percent and look forward to it’s inception. This could facilitate patients take a more active role in supporting their health decisions.

http://www.yepod.com/?p=24491

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

http://www.Yepod.com


poweredbyguardian Patients should have online access to medical records, says reportThis article titled “Patients should have online access to medical records, says report” was written by Denis Campbell, health correspondent, for The Guardian on Friday 23rd December 2011 01.27 UTC

NHS patients will be allowed to see and edit their medical records under proposals in a government-commissioned report.

The plan is contained in a report that an expert advisory group, headed by Professor Steve Field, the coalition’s NHS troubleshooter, is finalising before handing it to the Department of Health.

The changes would enable patients to view their whole medical history, study the result of diagnostic tests and see what drugs they have been prescribed before. They would also be able to check on their next appointment and order a repeat prescription.

The NHS Future Forum will outline the significant extension of patients’ rights in a report on how greater availability of information in the health service can improve treatment and make users of NHS services feel more involved and empowered.

The plan will help the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, finally realise his longstanding goal of an “information revolution” intended to help put patients more in control of their own care.

The scheme could be operational in England inside three years, the forum believes.

One forum member said that in an age when citizens could access their bank account details from their home computer, it was “unsustainable” for existing restrictions on patients’ access to their medical records to continue.

Currently, patients’ right to see their records is protected under the NHS Constitution but they have to apply for access and explain why they want to see them.

Although the recommendations are not binding on the government, Lord Howe, the health minister in the House of Lords, has already welcomed that plan. “We fully support patients having online access to their personal GP records. Our vision for a modern NHS is to give patients more information and control over their health,” he told today’s Times.

Patient groups are also likely to back the plan. “Many patients phone our helpline saying that they are having difficulty accessing their medical records from their GP, even though the NHS Constitution states that they have a legal right to do this,” said Katherine Murphy, chief executive of the Patients Association.

But, in a sign that not everyone involved may welcome the change, Murphy added that patient confidentiality was crucial.

“Health records are among the most personal and sensitive information kept about patients and they must be protected. There must be a guarantee that all patient data will be protected and that it will not be possible to trace back information to an individual”, she said.

Family doctors’ attitudes to the plan will be vital. GPs may not back the idea of patients having such access, which could see them allowed to suggest corrections. But the forum’s report will highlight the positive effect on doctor-patient relations of introducing such a scheme..

 Patients should have online access to medical records, says report

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

The incredible shrinking laboratory or ‘lab-on-a-chip’

December 2, 2011

Blood samples are picture 007 The incredible shrinking laboratory or lab on a chip

As technology races ever so quickly into the future, it does so by making daily activities in the laboratory much more easier to perform tests. It’s amazing how much information can be retrieved from just one drop of human blood. The benefits of such tests being done more quickly and inexpensive is that we can now do them more frequently. By adopting a more active role in our health and performing frequent blood tests , we can detect an underlaying disease before it progresses too far…and perhaps save our own lives..

http://www.yepod.com/?p=20890

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony   


poweredbyguardian The incredible shrinking laboratory or lab on a chipThis article titled “The incredible shrinking laboratory or ‘lab-on-a-chip’” was written by Alok Jha, science correspondent, for guardian.co.uk on Monday 28th November 2011 15.27 UTC

When a doctor wants to carry out a test, she will probably prick you with a needle, fill up several test tubes of your blood, label, package and send them to some centralised hospital laboratory. Technicians will then take the contents, perform the various biochemical analyses needed, write up the results and send back the documentation in a few weeks, perhaps longer if there’s a backlog.

The process is slow and labour-intensive. What if you could reduce the whole business to a few minutes? What if, for the majority of ailments or questions, the doctor only needed a drop of your blood and could test you for viruses or cancers while you wait in her surgery? With a lab-on-a-chip, that is already possible.

Quick tests are not a new idea – pregnancy tests can be done at home and diabetics can quickly and easily measure their blood sugar levels using only a drop of blood – but complex diagnoses still need labs and technicians.

“With a lab-on-a-chip you can do a quick diagnostic test and get information right there, which is very useful when somebody’s got a disease that’s got a very short timeline to be treated,” says Mark Morrison, CEO of the Institute of Nanotechnology in Stirling, UK. “What it effectively does is miniaturises and compacts all the different processes that a researcher or a technician in the diagnostic lab uses.”

The lab-on-a-chip shrinks the pipettes, beakers and test tubes of a modern chemistry lab onto a microchip-sized wafer of glass or plastic. Perhaps you want to know which viruses are in a sample of blood? Or, on the battlefield, which biological warfare agent is present in a soldier’s bloodstream? Put in a drop of blood at one end and the carefully carved channels take its constituent molecules past a circuit of nanometre-sized chemical and physical tests that poke, prod and characterise them to answer your question, however complicated. A chip developed by the University of Alberta, for example, can screen for chromosome mutations that cause a range of cancers.

The platform blurs nanotechnology, biotechnology and micro-electronics. And it is not specific to medicine – it is being developed for environmental monitoring of pollutants and, increasingly, in basic scientific research to speed up the once-tedious aspects of examining genes or testing the properties of new materials.

Prof Tom Duke at the London Centre for Nantechnology has been working on a chip that can detect whether a blood sample contains HIV. Current tests require testing in large laboratories staffed by skilled clinicians, which is a hindrance if you want to test people in resource-poor countries where the disease is rife.

Duke’s chip simplifies that process using a sensor that only requires a drop of blood at one end. The blood is separated into its parts by an array of nanometre-sized silicon pillars in the sensor and the biggest bits – such as blood cells and large proteins – are trapped. Any virus particles pass between the pilars to the other end of the sensor, where they are attracted to a series of tiny cantilevers coated with antibodies. These are, in essence, mini diving boards that bend when something lands on them, and that deflection can be measured by bouncing a laser off them. The more the diving boards are deflected, the more virus is present. “This platform can be used for pretty much any viral or bacterial disease,” says Duke.

There are several advantages to the lab-on-a-chip approach, beyond the convenience of being able to test in the field. The test sample required is much smaller because of the sensitivity of the chip, which is useful if you need to measure trace gases in the atmosphere or the very earliest stages of a disease when the chemical markers in the blood are low in number and would probably be missed by standard tests.

“Potentially you can detect the presence of, for example, cancer or diabetes at a much earlier stage and then treat it more effectively,” says Morrison. “If you treat the disease earlier on, you have a much greater chance of success.”

The Simbas chip, designed by a team of researchers led by Ivan Dimov at the University of California, Berkeley, can detect a biological component in blood at a concentration of around 1 part per 40 billion. “That can be roughly thought of as finding a fine grain of sand in a 1,700-gallon sand pile,” says Dimov. The self-contained chip can get results from a drop of blood in 10 minutes, without the need for any external pumps, tubes or power supply.

Researchers interested in basic physiology are also finding a use for these sophisticated mini laboratories. Scientists at Harvard University have created a lung on a chip that contains several types of tissue and can be used in experiments to understand basic function. They can simulate flowing blood, introduce pollutants and toxins to see how the “lung” reacts and even stretch and contract the cells to simulate breathing.

The technology will no doubt get faster, cheaper and more abundant. But there are some ethical questions coming along the pipeline, along with the technical ones. Most important, while it is still in its infancy and still relatively expensive, who gets access to it? And, since many of the devices will be used to test for an individual’s susceptibility to specific genetic diseases, another question is who should be able to access to that information? “As a scientist I’d say screen everybody for every disease because then you know who is going to get something and you can treat them early on,” says Morrison. “But that’s maybe looking at it from a utopian point of view.”

The dystopian alternative is a precautionary note rather than an inevitability and, in any case, debates around future access to genetic and medical data are already under way, thanks to a rapidly improving arsenal of medical and environmental sensors. Miniature laboratories on silicon and glass chips are another, invaluable tool in that arsenal.

The Guardian is working in association with the European Union’s NanoChannels project to create a portal for information on the technical and ethical challenges associated with nanotechnology

 The incredible shrinking laboratory or lab on a chip

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Why women want to gain weights

November 18, 2011

Evelyn Stevenson powerlif 007 Why women want to gain weights

Weightlifting is an excellent way to maitain a fit and firmer body. I am not surprise that more woman are finding that this form of exercise can be of great benefit. I myself workout 3 times a week with dumbbells in my apartment. Remember one rule…start slow and gradually increase the weights. Always consult with a doctor before taking on a new exercise routine.

http://www.yepod.com/?p=19311

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony


poweredbyguardian Why women want to gain weightsThis article titled “Why women want to gain weights” was written by Sarah Ditum, for The Guardian on Thursday 17th November 2011 21.00 UTC

Over the last 100 years or so, the pursuit of female physical perfection has included organ-crushing corsetry, starvation and the surgical insertion of synthetic implants. But finally, it seems, the healthy goal of becoming physically strong is gaining popularity.

You may think this is nothing new. But Evelyn Stevenson, model, personal trainer and British champion powerlifter (last weekend, she won silver at the World Championships), says she has only recently seen a change in her clients’ ambitions. “They used to say: ‘I want to tone up and lose weight.’ But weight isn’t the best indicator [of fitness],” she adds. “Recently, a new client said: ‘I really like the athletic build that Jennifer Aniston has.’”

This growing acceptance that strong physiques are not anti-feminine has been reinforced by the prominence given to female competitors in the run-up to the London Olympics – in mainstream media as well as on the sports pages. When Victoria Pendleton followed up her cycling gold medal in 2008 by turning FHM cover girl, it felt like something new: the world had decided women could be both sporty and sexy.

Nevertheless, Stevenson says she often has to reassure clients that weightlifting is not necessarily a path to a bulging body-builder’s physique. Low testosterone levels mean women are unlikely to bulk up, and a training programme focused on larger weights rather than lengthy sessions will lead to a toned, rather than ripped, appearance.

Perhaps the best thing about pursuing strength over slenderness is that it can transform your relationship with your body from one of criticism (why can’t I fit into those jeans?) to one of pride (look at the size of the weight I’m benchpressing). “Being fit is – I don’t want to say sexy, but empowering,” says Stevenson. “I know I can carry my bags home from Sainsbury’s.”

 Why women want to gain weights

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Resveratrol pills may mimic effects of exercise and low-calorie diet

November 4, 2011

grapes 001 Resveratrol pills may mimic effects of exercise and low calorie diet

Resveratol has been known for some time to be of benefits to a healthy life-style. Recent studies have uncovered additional qualities that may encourage more persons to add resveratrol to their diets. Reducing blood sugar is a wonderful metabolic side effect that can benefit the millions of people diagnosed with diabetes. So perhaps resveratrol deserves a closer look at…..

http://www.yepod.com/?p=17431

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

logo smaller with star Resveratrol pills may mimic effects of exercise and low calorie diet


poweredbyguardian Resveratrol pills may mimic effects of exercise and low calorie dietThis article titled “Resveratrol pills may mimic effects of exercise and low-calorie diet” was written by Nic Fleming, for The Guardian on Tuesday 1st November 2011 16.08 UTC

Taking supplements of a substance found in grape skin can lower sugar and fat levels in the blood and reduce blood pressure, according to a small study.

Scientists who gave tablets containing purified resveratrol to obese men found it had some metabolic effects similar to those from exercise and calorie restriction, including lowering blood pressure and blood sugar levels.

Research in animals over the past decade has suggested the compound can slow the development of age-related diseases and increase lifespan. However, these studies have attracted growing criticism and have yet to be replicated in humans.

“The effects of resveratrol were modest but they consistently point towards beneficial metabolic adaptions,” said Prof Patrick Schrauwen of Maastricht University in the Netherlands, who led the new study. Although the chemical is found naturally in grape skin and red wine, there is no suggestion that it would be possible to ingest enough of it from these sources to gain the beneficial effect.

Prof Schrauwen and colleagues gave 11 obese men either a daily 150mg resveratrol supplement or a placebo for 30 days. Four weeks later, the two groups swapped over so that those who took the supplements first time around were given placebos and vice versa.

Regular measurements showed resveratrol lowered blood sugar levels and improved insulin sensitivity, as well as cutting triglycerides – fats found in the blood that can increase heart disease risk. Resveratrol also reduced both sleeping and resting metabolic rate and cut blood pressure.

Previous research has shown that calorie restriction can extend lifespan in laboratory animals. Some studies suggest it also offers protection from diseases such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, though this remains controversial.

Calorie restriction works in a similar way to resveratrol, by triggering the production of a protein called SIRT1 which improves metabolic function and keeps cells healthy in the face of stress.

Muscle biopsies carried out by Prof Schrauwen’s team confirmed that participants taking resveratrol saw increased SIRT1 levels. They also strongly suggested the beneficial effects on metabolism were associated with improved functioning of mitochondria, the energy factories within cells.

“Healthy people are good at switching efficiently from using fat as an energy source to glucose in the blood when it becomes available,” said Prof Schrauwen. “The results of our pilot study tended to suggest that might be part of the link to the beneficial health effects of resveratrol, but that needs further study.”

The results are published in the journal Cell Metabolism.

Prof Schrauwen, acknowledging that his sample size was small, said he was seeking funding for a larger and longer trial. “This is small, proof of principle study, but the results are so promising that I think it is important that we conduct a bigger study,” he said.

 Resveratrol pills may mimic effects of exercise and low calorie diet

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Aspirin cuts cancer risk in people with an inherited susceptibility

October 30, 2011

 aspirin 006 Aspirin cuts cancer risk in people with an inherited susceptibility

Taking aspirin seems to be getting more popular these days…that is good news for the pharmaceutical companies..but can also be good news for the rest of us…perhaps taking aspirin is not only good to take to lower the risk of an heart attack by thinning out the blood, but it may help us lower the risk of developing some types of cancers…only time will tell if this idea has any merit.. consult your physician before taking or adding any medication to your diet.

http://www.yepod.com/?p=16840

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony 


 

Some people with a family history of cancer could halve their risk of developing the disease by taking daily doses of aspirin, according to the results of a 10-year trial of the treatment.

The study shows that regularly taking the medicine cuts the risk of bowel cancer by more than 60% in those with a particular genetic predisposition to get the disease – as well as reducing the risk of other hereditary cancers.

Scientists who led the study said people with several family members with cancers other than breast, blood and prostate might be advised to start taking aspirin daily from the age of 45.

They said those without a family history of the disease might also consider doing so, but that they should make a personal assessment of the risks and benefits and get medical advice. Anyone thinking of taking the drug regularly should consult their doctor first.

Doctors already prescribe low, daily doses of aspirin to people at increased risk of heart attacks and strokes, and evidence has been growing of anti-cancer properties for 20 years. However, this is the first long-term, randomised controlled trial to show such an effect.

The trial involved people with Lynch syndrome, a genetic abnormality that predisposes carriers to develop bowel cancer and other solid organ cancers including endometrial, ovarian, stomach, kidney, oesophageal, brain and skin tumours.

The condition affects at least one in 1,000 people. Carriers are around 10 times as likely to develop cancer and often do so at a young age.

Professor John Burn of Newcastle University, who led the study, estimated that if all 30,000 or so people with Lynch syndrome in the UK were to start taking two aspirin tablets a day then some 10,000 cancers would be prevented over the next 30 years, saving about a thousand lives. The downside of the treatment is that around an extra thousand people would develop stomach ulcers as a side-effect.

“People with a genetic susceptibility are a model system,” said Burn, whose work is published on Friday in the Lancet online. “They are more sensitive to the environmental triggers to cancer.

“If we can do something to change cancer progression in people at high genetic risk, then that’s telling us what we might all benefit. But we are not making a recommendation for the general population. Everyone can take this evidence and make their own choice.

“In between you have the people who have a family history [of cancer]. Those individuals may well decide to put themselves on aspirin and that would be a reasonable conclusion from the data currently available.”

Between 1999 and 2005, about half of a group of 861 Lynch syndrome carriers were given two aspirins (600mg) a day, while the rest took placebos.

By 2010 those who had taken aspirin for at least two years were 63% less likely to have developed bowel cancer.

Looking at all forms of the disease, almost 30% of those in the placebo group developed a Lynch syndrome-related cancer, compared with 15% for those given aspirin.

The most common side effects associated with taking aspirin are gastrointestinal ulcers and stomach bleeding. There is also an very small increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke, in which a blood vessel in the brain bursts.

There was no difference in the proportions of the study groups suffering such side-effects.

Burn added that he takes low-dose aspirin tablets as a preventative measure. “That was a balanced judgment based on weighing risks and benefits. I know I might get an ulcer or a cerebral bleed but I’d rather not have a heart attack, stroke or cancer. That’s my choice.”

Aspirin is a synthetic version of the active component of willow bark, salicylic acid, which has been used as a medicine for its anti-inflammatory properties for hundreds of years. Salicylates also trigger programmed cell death to help diseased plants contain the spread of infection.

“It’s not a huge stretch to think that if salicylate induces programmed cell death in plants to kill infected cells, maybe it’s doing similar things in the animal kingdom to enhance the death of aberrant cells causing cancer,” said Prof Burn.

“This adds to the growing body of evidence showing the importance of aspirin, and aspirin-like drugs, in the fight against cancer and emphasises how critical it is to carry out long-term international research,” said Prof Chris Paraskeva, a bowel cancer expert at the University of Bristol.

On Friday the researchers will launch a website to recruit 3,000 people with Lynch syndrome worldwide to take part in a five-year trial to determine the best dose of aspirin to take.

 Aspirin cuts cancer risk in people with an inherited susceptibility

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Breast screening is no longer a no-brainer

October 27, 2011

Breast cancer screening 007 Breast screening is no longer a no brainer

When we speak about breast cancer our thought wonder to a female member or friend who have lost or won their battle. But it must be made clear that men as well, although rare, can develop breast cancer. One thing is clear is that rountine checks with your family can be life saving. So what are you waiting for? Make your appointment today and win the fight!

http://www.yepod.com/?p=16712

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony    


poweredbyguardian Breast screening is no longer a no brainerThis article titled “Breast screening is no longer a no-brainer” was written by Sarah Boseley, for guardian.co.uk on Wednesday 26th October 2011 15.00 UTC

It may seem like a no-brainer to turn up at the breast-screening clinic when the summons falls through the letterbox. Most of us are scared of cancer. Most of us have heard that if you catch it early, there is more chance of a cure.

But for some years now, there has been a growing volume of dissent to this orthodoxy – and it hasn’t come from anti-medical campaigners, suspicious of toxic drugs. It has come from within the scientific community. Those who are asking the big question – is breast screening always a good thing? – are from a group with one of the best-respected scientific pedigrees. This is the Cochrane Collaboration, set up to weigh the totality of scientific evidence and tell us what really works and what does not.

They have been publishing their findings in top medical journals, such as the Lancet and the British Medical Journal, and news organisations have run stories – but every time we have asked the NHS screening programme for a comment, the Cochrane findings have been summarily dismissed. Most scientists, we have been told, do not agree with the Cochrane researchers. Studies are cited that show screening saves lives.

I have felt for some time that there has been an element in all this of “don’t frighten the horses” and, personally, I think it underestimates – nay, insults – the intelligence of women. Screening is not like vaccination. We are not going to infect anybody else if we don’t go for breast screening. If a cancer is missed, it is an individual who suffers, not the population as a whole. But the information we are given in NHS screening leaflets, echoing the official rebuttal of the Cochrane studies, barely mentions any possible downsides to going along.

And, yes, there are downsides. Nobody disputes now that there is some “over-diagnosis” and “over-treatment”. What the X-rays show is often not much more than a tiny spot on a screen. Once upon a time, cancer doctors believed every one of those would, if left, turn into an aggressive cancer with the potential to kill. A couple of decades ago, the approach to breast cancer treatment was root and branch – a “Halsted” mastectomy, named after the surgeon who excised as much of the chest as he could in the belief that he was saving lives. That doesn’t happen any more – now surgery is conservative and as limited as possible. Doctors try to deliver the smallest, most effective, amount of surgery, drugs and radiotherapy because of the long-term damage they can cause.

But just as surgeons have backtracked on radical mastectomy, so now it may be time to backtrack on radical diagnosis. According to the Nordic Cochrane collaboration, not every spot on the X-ray will turn into aggressive cancer. Their statistical evidence – looking at the numbers of women screened in a big Swedish trial in the 1980s compared with those who were not – is that less cancers were found in those not screened. That is because, they believe, some early-stage cancers regress – they disappear again without causing any harm. Others, we know, grow so slowly that women will die at a ripe old age of something else.

Breast cancer treatment these days is very much better than when screening began. Survival rates are high. Urgent treatment of an invisible clump of mutant cells may not be necessary. Screening will always be important and should be available for those who want it – especially for women whose family history or other factors put them at high risk. But women should be told of the potential harms as well as benefits so they can make an informed choice – and where the X-ray picks something up, perhaps she can sometimes be given a waiting and watching option, as in men’s prostate cancer.

But whatever the outcome of the review announced by the government’s cancer director, Professor Sir Mike Richards, the most important thing is that it will have happened. Serious issues will be seriously discussed and women, many of them for the first time, will know that breast screening is not, in fact, just a no-brainer and that there are choices that can be made. Hopefully that will not be frightening, but empowering. Thank you, Sir Mike, for that.

 Breast screening is no longer a no brainer

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Coping with the death of a child

October 15, 2011

Nicola Streeten 007 Coping with the death of a child

Dealing with the death of a loved one can be one of the toughest things in life. Many individuals avoid seeking help from friends,family, or professional counseling. If you are finding it impossible to perform you daily living activities or have fallen into a depression, reach out for help before your condition deteriorates. You can overcome your painful loss.

http://www.yepod.com/?p=15008

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony 


poweredbyguardian Coping with the death of a childThis article titled “Coping with the death of a child” was written by Jon Henley, for The Guardian on Friday 14th October 2011 23.05 UTC

Billy Edwin Plowman Streeten died on 19 September 1995, aged two years and two months. That’s where we have to begin. No point trying to fudge things. It is, anyway, the reason this article is being written. Or at least, not Billy’s death itself, but the way people – family, friends, strangers, colleagues, his parents above all – dealt with it.

“It’s OK,” says Nicola Streeten, Billy’s mother. “Honestly, it’s completely fine. It was 16 years ago. We’re all right with it now. We realised then we were going through something huge, something absolutely massive, but we knew that eventually it would transform itself into something else, and it has. It’s OK. Really.”

Part of that monstrous experience has been transformed into a remarkable book, Billy, Me & You, published this month. A graphic novel, or more accurately a graphic memoir, drawn from the diary that Nicola kept, it is searchingly honest, and desperately sad at times. At others, it is genuinely very funny. Quite a feat.

“My motivation,” Nicola says, “was to tell a story people couldn’t put down. Not just about me, but questioning people’s responses, society’s response, to trauma and grief. I wanted the laughing and the crying. Not a misery memoir, a book for people who’ve had shit thrown at them. It may be cathartic for some, but for me it was a work of art. Not therapy.”

It would have been different if she’d done it at the time. We’re at her friend and editor’s house next to the British Museum in London. Nicola, 48 now, talks fast and laughs often. The day we meet is, by coincidence, the anniversary of Billy’s death; she and his father, her husband John, 58, have come to London from their Lincolnshire home and had their annual commemorative lunch together. (By the same token, they place a small notice in the Guardian every 19 September: “Our equivalent of putting flowers on his grave.”)

“We’re not at all religious,” Nicola says. “We couldn’t do God. So we kind of invented our own superstitious belief system. And part of that is, every year, we come to London for lunch on the day he died, and John puts the in memoriam in the paper.” But 16 years ago today, they were walking out of the Royal Brompton hospital, clutching their dead son’s possessions.

Billy was born when Nicola was 30. The couple were living in Crouch End, London; she teaching English as a foreign language, he an established artist. “It’s the greatest thing that can happen, when your baby’s born,” she says. “We just wanted to enjoy having a child. We shared the childcare from the start. Thank God – that meant we’d both had a fair innings.”

All Billy’s early tests had been fine; he was a normal baby. “Always on the bottom line of the graphs,” Nicola says, “but he never dropped off. We thought the doctors were being fussy. You never really know, though, do you, when it’s your first? You’re never really sure.”

When he was one, Billy got pneumonia and had to go to hospital for intravenous antibiotics. He recovered, but a shadow on his lung didn’t clear. “Over the next year, they ran every test,” says Nicola. “Cystic fibrosis, cancer, heart, the lot. And he was running around, fine. You could never have told.”

Eventually, a consultant at the Whittington hospital concluded it was asthma. That winter, Billy got ill a lot; coughs, colds, trips to the hospital, lots of medicine. In the summer, just after his second birthday in early July, the family booked a holiday cottage in Orkney. There Billy got really ill. “The doctor told us he needed an air ambulance, to Aberdeen,” Nicola says. “Billy couldn’t believe his luck: a helicopter!”

Back in London, his case was transferred to the Royal Brompton. There, suddenly, the experts announced: this isn’t asthma, this is heart-related. Three congenital deformities; Billy was suffering from pulmonary hypertension.

By early September, Nicola says: “They gave us our options. They could operate, in which case there was a 30% chance of success. They could try for a heart and lung transplant; not recommended. Or they could do nothing, in which case Billy would eventually die, slowly and painfully, because he would end up not being able to breathe.”

The options weren’t really options. “In any case, we’d latched on to the word ‘success’,” says Nicola. “Crazy, because you’d never get in a plane that had a 30% chance of landing safely. We all moved into the hospital, 10 days before. It was going to be a 15-hour op. In the evening, we went to the cinema. There were no mobile phones, of course, so I borrowed my sister’s pager. I was looking at it all through the film.”

Back at the hospital, Nicola and John were told the operation had been a success. Billy was in intensive care. “We were to go and get a good night’s sleep and have a leisurely breakfast,” Nicola says. “Then the next morning, when we got out of the lift, there were nurses running in the corridor. They put us in a waiting room. They said: ‘We’re so sorry.’ And we – extraordinary, isn’t it? – we said: ‘Thank you.’”

The scene after that moment, Nicola and John leaving the hospital, forms the opening page of Billy, Me & You. The book offers acutely observed snapshots of the couple through the decade and a half that follows: their savage grief, deep despair, dreams of suicide; the wildly differing reactions of those around them; Billy’s funeral; their return to work and, gradually, something resembling normality; group and individual therapy; the birth of their daughter Sally; the move to Lincolnshire; Nicola’s new career as an illustrator. It ends with a publisher taking a serious interest in Billy’s story.

The sum is probably more revealing – and certainly more affecting – about the experience of loss and grief than most self-help books. There are instants of crushing realisation (“Shall we go for dinner?” “A bit short notice for a babysitter … Oh yes!”) and of crucifying guilt (“Is it because I walked under ladders on purpose? Had an abortion when I was younger? Punishment from a God I don’t believe in?”).

Moments of dreadful self-doubt, too (“I’m not a mother … But I’m not not a mother … What am I?”); hopeless self-pity (“Nobody said anything to me about Billy … all day long”) and rage (“You want to put a bench in the park in Billy’s name? So I can sit there and watch everyone else’s alive children? Are you completely insensitive – or just an idiot?”) And moments of absurdity (Billy will be going to the crematorium, the funeral director tells them in hushed and Victorian tones, on the front seat of what we call “a hearsette”).

Nobody really tells you, says Nicola, about “the awful arrogance of grief. My capacity for intolerance, that was an eye-opener. I think you just felt like you have a … a licence to be foul to people. There we were, in the middle of this lovely north London suburban life, all parks and mortgages and good schools and organic food and pensions, and I just got so angry with everyone’s obsession with all this bourgeois, crappy stuff. Didn’t they realise how unimportant it all was, compared with what we’d been through?”

The couple spent a year, Nicola says, “very consciously working on it. Just hanging on … Grief and death affect everyone differently, of course. I was seriously worried that John might kill himself, really. We started therapy. I think we both knew very soon that our whole outlook on the world had changed. And then two years later, in 1997, Sally came along. There was life, after this. And things started to pick up.”

But there’s no limit to the extent of human awkwardness around death. Especially the death of a child. “My own pet hate,” says Nicola, “is when people say, ‘Oh yeah, John and Nicola – their baby died.’ Because Billy was a four-year block of my life: the thinking about him, the pregnancy, the two years he was alive, the solid year or more of grieving … That doesn’t feel like a baby, it really doesn’t.”

Struck by the different ways people reacted to her news, she started judging their responses, sometimes silently awarding marks out of 10. The worst, she says, were those who refused, for whatever reason, to acknowledge what had happened. “It could have been worse,” was bad; “Oh, really? My friend’s baby died too,” and “I can just imagine what you’re going through,” were pretty much the pits. Marginally better was “Would you like to come to dinner?” and “You must have another baby.” Best of all was: “I’m so sorry.”

An avid diary-keeper as a teenager, Nicola began writing one again soon after Billy died. She’s glad she did, if only because returning to those journals 13 years later, when she began working with her teenage daughter Sally on the magazine stories that would eventually become Billy, Me & You, she realised the tricks that memory plays.

“I cried every day, for a year,” she says. “In my memory, I only cried once. But it’s in my diaries, written down. Every day. I cried every single day, for a year. Looking back now, it’s clear we were pretty much mental for about five years.” (She didn’t cry once while she was working on this book, though: “It’s the most pleasurable thing I’ve done, about the worst thing that’s ever happened to me.”)

So what is Billy for her, today? There is a fair chance, had he lived, that he’d be starting his first term at university. “He’s there,” she says, “if he comes up. It’s no longer upsetting to talk about him. But he is locked in that moment, locked with us in that time. I can’t really project him into the future like that.”

John and Nicola have a cabinet of “old stuff” at home; a kind of informal archive. There’s a favourite bib of Billy’s; Nicola’s diaries; a milk bottle melted in some long-forgotten sterilisation process; Billy’s death certificate; Nicola’s successful pregnancy test; a letter published, two days after Billy died, in the Guardian’s Private Lives section, from a woman who had lost her baby daughter at three days. The reply that Nicola wrote, concluded: “There is nothing to say for the emptiness inside you, except that time will make the pain less acute.”

In any case, says Nicola, Sally is their focus now: “We wouldn’t want her to be overshadowed by a dead brother, whom she never met. Billy is a memory. But having this book, now, as a product of all that we went through … That’s nice.”

Billy, Me & You by Nicola Streeten is published by Turnaround, £11.99. To order a copy for £9.59 with free UK p&p, go to guardian.co.uk/bookshop or call 0330 333 6846

 Coping with the death of a child

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Mapping the body: the sigmoid colon

October 13, 2011

The large Intestine 007 Mapping the body: the sigmoid colon

Not one of the easiest subjects to talk but the digestive system is an important area to descuss and understand clearly. A lot can be determine from the color and consistency of one’s feces. This area have been the victim of countless jokes for decades but its not a joking matter. Many diseases and conditions can affect the bowels. Constipation is a serious condition commonly seen in adults over the age of 50. Usually a change in diet to include more fiber and water will resolve this problem.

http://www.yepod.com/?p=14894

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony  


poweredbyguardian Mapping the body: the sigmoid colonThis article titled “Mapping the body: the sigmoid colon” was written by Gabriel Weston, for The Guardian on Monday 3rd October 2011 20.00 UTC

It is usually patients not doctors who balk at the sight of a medical instrument being unwrapped. But the flatus tube, used to treat a condition of the sigmoid colon, is one no surgeon relishes.

The sigmoid is an S-shaped stretch of large bowel, about 40cm long, which leads up to the rectum. Its main function is to store faeces until it is ready to enter the rectum and be expelled through the anus, and it is the site of a variety of problems.

Inflammatory bowel disease such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease may occur here. Diverticulitis, in which little outpouchings of bowel form and become inflamed, is more common in the sigmoid than any other part of the bowel. Small growths called polyps, as well as cancers, also favour this site.

The good thing about investigating sigmoid disease is that this part of the colon isn’t far from the outside world. It is easy to pass a rigid sigmoidoscope into the anus and get a decent view. For a more detailed look patients are sedated so that a flexible sigmoidoscope can be introduced, and biopsies can be taken through this. If necessary, it is possible to remove the entire part of the colon in a sigmoidectomy. Usually, the remaining colon can then be joined to the rectum.

But it is another condition that makes junior doctors quake in their surgical boots. Volvulus is when a part of the bowel twists on the tissue which attaches it to the abdominal wall, forming an obstruction and it is commoner here. Patients are usually over 50 and chronically constipated. In A&E, they describe abdominal pain and not having passed faeces or wind for days. Simple x-rays may show a sigmoid colon so distended that it extends all the way up to the chest-bone.

Although definitive treatment often involves surgery, it is the junior doctor’s job to deal with the acute situation with the help of the dreaded flatus tube. The patient lies on their side and a sigmoidoscope is inserted gently into the back passage. The junior then has to slowly manoeuvre the hollow flatus tube through the sigmoidoscope and into the obstructed loop. The key is to make sure the other end is directed over a bucket and not one’s shoes. The patient’s sense of enormous relief when fluid, flatus and faeces are expelled into the bucket is in inverse proportion to the doctor’s discomfort.

• Gabriel Weston is a surgeon and author of Direct Red: A Surgeon’s Story

 Mapping the body: the sigmoid colon

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Do You Have Constipation?

September 27, 2011


If you are like the millions of people who spend hours upon hours at work in front of a computer, then you most likely are experiencing constipation. The sitting position is not friendly when it comes to having a daily bowel movement. I really enjoy the cute video above, watch it and get some relief! See you again on   http://www.yepod.com

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Mapping the body: gastric pits

September 22, 2011

A close up of a gastric p 007 Mapping the body: gastric pits

The human stomach is a facinating organ responsible for the breakdown of food that will be absorbed into the body. Problems with the stomach is a source of hugh profits for the pharmaceutical companies. Individuals sometimes become dependent on laxatives,acid,or stomachache medications to relieve symptoms. If stomach symptoms do not subside within a week from onset, seek medical attention and allow a doctor to do a complete workup to determine the cause of your problems.

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony   


poweredbyguardian Mapping the body: gastric pitsThis article titled “Mapping the body: gastric pits” was written by Gabriel Weston, for The Guardian on Monday 19th September 2011 20.30 UTC

There’s a funny kind of hierarchy that exists among the organs. You simply don’t hear bladder surgeons boasting about their art in quite the same way that heart and brain surgeons do. And yet, even the most humble body part has its own complex and fascinating physiology.

I realised this when learning about the structure and function of the stomach. Previously, I had thought of the tummy as a lowly place, a mere dumping ground for anything we might choose to stuff in our mouths. I couldn’t have been more mistaken, and my new-found respect for the stomach gained focus when I read about the gastric pit.

If you look inside a stomach when dissecting a cadaver, or during an operation, it appears like a bag whose surface is thrown into a series of visible folds. These are called rugae, and enable the stomach to increase dramatically in size when it fills with food. What you can’t see with the naked eye is that the lining of the stomach (the mucosa) is interrupted by multiple tiny openings, each of which leads to a tiny hormone-producing tunnel. These are the gastric pits and each one is lined with a number of different types of cell, producing a separate, important gastric secretion.

The cells at the top of the pits produce mucus, which protects the stomach lining against gastric acid. Deeper down are two other cell types. Parietal cells generate stomach acid as well as a substance called intrinsic factor, which enables a vitamin called B12 to be absorbed further along in the gut. The impressively named chief cells secrete pepsinogen which, when it mixes with stomach acid, becomes an enzyme called pepsin. This helps to break down the protein we eat into smaller units that can be absorbed.

The heart may be in charge of pumping blood around the whole body. The brain may be master of all we do. But, at the tissue level, wonders are also to be found in those organs that we may think of as being more ordinary.

Gabriel Weston is a surgeon and author of Direct Red: A Surgeon’s Story

 Mapping the body: gastric pits

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Testosterone drops when men become fathers

September 17, 2011

Gymnast on the rings 007 Testosterone drops when men become fathers

More attention should be given to testosterone levels of men throughout their lives. There are many symptoms associated with decreased testosterone levels …one example is depression…many men diagnosed with clinical depression were found to have low levels of this hormone..but once testosterone injestions were administered by qualified physcians…symptoms of depression resolved..so get your testosterone checked out…

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

100 yepod logo size Testosterone drops when men become fathers 


poweredbyguardian Testosterone drops when men become fathersThis article titled “Testosterone drops when men become fathers” was written by Ian Sample, science correspondent, for The Guardian on Monday 12th September 2011 19.00 UTC

The hormone that defines the male of the species slumps dramatically when men become fathers, researchers have found.

Blood tests on 624 men in the Philippines revealed that levels of testosterone dropped substantially over a five year period in those who had children.

Men who devoted at least three hours a day to child care had even less testosterone, suggesting that looking after dependent children helped suppress the hormone. Testosterone is responsible for the male body shape, the distribution (and loss) of hair and a man’s sex drive.

Previous studies have shown that fathers tend to have lower testosterone, but it was unclear whether men with reduced levels were more likely to have children, or whether parenthood pushed testosterone down.

“It’s not the case that men with lower testosterone are simply more likely to become fathers,” said Lee Gettler, an anthropologist at Northwestern University in Illinois. “The men who started with high testosterone were more likely to become fathers, but once they did, their testosterone went down substantially.”

Christopher W. Kuzawa, a co-author on the study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, said fathers seemed “biologically wired” to help raise children.

“To see dramatic changes in response to family life is intriguing,” said Allan Pacey, an andrologist at Sheffield University. “The observations could make some evolutionary sense if we accept the idea that men with lower testosterone levels are more likely to be monogamous with their partner and care for children. However, it would be important to check that link between testosterone levels and behaviour before we could be certain.”

 Testosterone drops when men become fathers

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Mapping the body: achilles tendon

September 14, 2011

Heel 007 Mapping the body: achilles tendon

I have seen many injuries to the achilles tendon while treating patients over the years…most of them were strain/sprain injuries to the tendon or muscle. You must approach sport activity carefully, especially if you are now not as active ….due to family or occupation responsibilities keeping you from daily participation. Warming up and stretching muscles prior to physical activity will reduce your risk to injury.

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

logo smaller with star Mapping the body: achilles tendon


poweredbyguardian Mapping the body: achilles tendonThis article titled “Mapping the body: achilles tendon” was written by Gabriel Weston, for The Guardian on Monday 12th September 2011 20.30 UTC

There is truth in the view that doctors make the worst patients. I have never seen a person obstruct their own recovery more than a surgical consultant who snapped his achilles tendon while playing tennis.

The achilles is a ropelike band of tissue, which connects the calf muscle to the heel on each side, and is crucial for walking, running and jumping. With time and disuse, the tendon can become weak and prone to rupture. So it’s no surprise that injuries to this part of the body tend to occur in middle-aged men enjoying a spurt of uncharacteristic activity, especially where leaping and pivoting are involved. Tripping or falling from a height are also mechanisms of injury.

When it ruptures, sufferers feel sudden severe pain in the ankle or calf, and may hear an audible “pop”. Diagnosis in an emergency department is usually made by a doctor asking their patient to lie prone, feet dangling off the end of the examining table. On squeezing the calf muscle, an intact achilles will cause the foot to point – the absence of this reaction suggests a rupture. Although competitive athletes may be put forward for surgical repair of their tendons, most patients have their leg immobilised in a cast for at least six weeks.

Far worse than this, though, are fractures to the heel bone (or calcaneum). Such injuries tend to occur after a fall from a height or from severe twisting of the foot, and are known to be so painful that patients may be distracted from other injuries such as spinal or leg fractures, which often occur at the same time. Whether patients have surgery or not, it is usually not possible to start walking for at least three months after breaking your heel, and the incidence of lifelong disablility from chronic heel pain is high.

But after five weeks in a cast for his achilles tendon rupture, my boss decided he simply couldn’t bear to be hampered a day longer. He pulled off his own cast, and sprung out of the door, ready for another day at the hospital. He didn’t get as far as his car before he had ruptured his tendon all over again. Proving impatience is the surgeon’s true achilles heel.

Gabriel Weston is a surgeon and author of Direct Red: A Surgeon’s Story.

 Mapping the body: achilles tendon

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Chemotherapy breakthrough could could dramatically reduce side-effects

September 13, 2011

Kim Cattrall has chemothe 007 Chemotherapy breakthrough could could dramatically reduce side effects

Progress is being made in cancer research…side effects experienced by patients during chemotherapy can be reduced or even eliminated in the near future…a better delivery system of introducing anti-cancer therapy can also leave healthy cells intact…the “smart bomb” is here…

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

YEPOD.COM


 

poweredbyguardian Chemotherapy breakthrough could could dramatically reduce side effectsThis article titled “Chemotherapy breakthrough could could dramatically reduce side-effects” was written by Alok Jha, science correspondent, for The Guardian on Sunday 11th September 2011 23.01 UTC

Cancer researchers have developed a “smart bomb” treatment that can target tumours with drugs while leaving healthy body cells intact. The technique means that patients will suffer fewer side-effects from the toxic drugs used in chemotherapy.

The side-effects of cancer therapy – including hair loss, nausea and suppression of the immune system – can be debilitating. In many cases, the effects of the drugs can contribute to the ultimate cause of death.

In experiments on mice, Laurence Patterson of the University of Bradford found that he could localise a cancer drug to the site of tumours and thereby limit its toxic impact in the body. All the animals, which had been implanted with human cancer cells responded to the targeted treatment and saw their tumours shrink. In half the animals, the tumours disappeared altogether. Professor Patterson will present his work at the British Science Festival in Bradford on Monday.

“We’ve got a sort of smart bomb that will only be active in the tumour and will not cause damage to normal tissue,” he said. “It’s a new cancer treatment that could be effective against pretty much all types of tumour – we’ve looked at colon, prostate, breast, lung and sarcoma so far, and all have responded very well to this treatment.”

The drug is based on a modified version of an existing cancer drug called coltrazine. In normal situations, this drug is delivered as part of a patient’s chemotherapy regime and, in addition to attacking cancer cells, it can kill healthy cells, too. “There are many agents currently used in the clinic for the treatment of cancer that are essentially poisons,” said Patterson.

“Normal chemotherapy can often be the cause of death of the patient as opposed to dying from the tumour growth itself. Any treatment that is a poison that can be retained and is only active in the tumour is clearly very attractive.” Patterson’s team has designed a way to make the coltrazine active only when it comes into contact with a tumour. They did this by attaching a string of specific amino acids to the coltrazine, which made the drug inert. In this state, it can wander through the body freely and will not kill any cells it comes into contact with. But when the drug reaches the site of a solid tumour, the chain of amino acids is removed by an enzyme present on the surface of the cancer, called MMP-1. At this point, the coltrazine becomes active and can do its work in killing nearby cells.

MMP1 is used by tumours to break down the cellular environment around itself and to enable the tumour to dig a path through normal tissue. It also gives the tumour access to nutrients and oxygen by encouraging the normal blood supply of a person to grow towards it. “If you can starve that tumour of that blood supply, then you shut off its ability to grow and move around the body,” said Patterson.

In the experiments, he said, all the mice responded to the treatment. “Sometimes, the treatment is so effective, you remove the ability of that tumour to grow – you appear to cure the mouse. In some studies, we were able to cure half the mice: these animals no longer had any tumour growing in them and they appeared healthy for the 60 or so days of the trial.”

An important use of the technique is that it can reach tumours that have spread throughout the body.

Paul Workman, head of cancer therapeutics at the Institute of Cancer Research, said: “This is an interesting new approach to targeting tumour blood vessels that solid cancers need for their growth. The project is still at quite an early stage, but the results so far look promising in the laboratory models that have been studied. If confirmed in more extensive laboratory studies, drugs based on this approach could be very useful as part of combination treatments for various cancers.”

The Bradford scientists hope that, with adequate funding, their drug delivery system could enter phase 1 clinical trials on people within 18 months.

 Chemotherapy breakthrough could could dramatically reduce side effects Chemotherapy breakthrough could could dramatically reduce side effects

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Annoying? Yoga? Surely not

September 7, 2011

Yoga 007 Annoying? Yoga? Surely not

I must agree…that yoga is not my first choice when it comes to maintaining a healthy life-style…yes some of the positions you find yourself in are quite silly…but most of my friends seem to benefit from yoga. They seem very focused,organized, and calm in their jobs and social gatherings. Perhaps yoga could be of some good…at least I can work on touching my toes…

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony 


poweredbyguardian Annoying? Yoga? Surely notThis article titled “Annoying? Yoga? Surely not” was written by Sarah Miller, for The Guardian on Tuesday 6th September 2011 20.00 UTC

In addition to being somewhat crazy – a shrink once diagnosed me with borderline personality disorder, which I thought was a bit of a stretch until I realised that, like everyone else, he just wanted to have sex with me – I am a yoga teacher. Should you, recoiling in horror as you read this, find yourself asking, “But how does someone like this become a yoga teacher?”, the short answer is that I gave a man with a beard and his hot wife $3,200. The long answer is … well, I’d like to say that it’s because if I hadn’t become obsessed with yoga I’d probably be dead, because that’s what people always say about things like this. But that would be, frankly, a little overdramatic. Let’s just say that if I didn’t do yoga everything bad about me would just be worse, and what is bad is already bad enough.

Now, because you can’t get something for nothing, there’s a problem: yoga can be extremely annoying. There’s no getting around it. Yoga has moments of such profound annoyingness that after I finished Eat, Pray, Love (I read the ashram section 100 times) all I could think was: “You wrote an entire book about yoga and meditation and you never mentioned, ‘Oh, by the way, sometimes you will want to punch these people in the face’.”

And this is where I perform my public service; in yoga we call that a seva (how annoying is that?). All the stuff Elizabeth Gilbert was too high on homemade pizza and Javier Bardem penis to mention, you need to know. Everyone’s always telling you how great yoga is, and that’s true, but then you go and maybe the studio smells like onions steamed in cat pee, and it might have been helpful to know about that beforehand.

You need to know exactly what will disturb you before you get there, so you can prepare; and you should also know that, even though everyone around you will seem perfectly unperturbed, someone feels your pain. Oh, and by the way, I want to underscore that what follows below is what bugs me about yoga; everything else is a glittering gift from Lord Shiva. Namaste!

People who just saw each other yesterday will hug like one of them was just rescued from a burning plane. I’ve always thought of a hug as a slightly protracted, lightly physical way of saying hello to people I know fairly well.

But regular practitioners of yoga see hugs as a great way to spend an afternoon. You will want to stare at them and wonder, “Are they really pressing their whole bodies together?” (yes); “are their eyes closed?” (they are); “do they really have dreamy looks on their faces?” (yes, yes, yes). But remember, while you’re staring you’re wasting valuable time in which you could be cultivating your “I am not the sort of person who likes to be hugged for long periods of time” vibe. This is easier said than done because you will sometimes see people at yoga – people you actually know – with whom you may wish to make brief, friendly physical contact. Engage in such exchanges as you wish, but realise that you are setting yourself up as a person who willingly receives hugs, and these people will not take the extra mental step to say, “Oh, but above-the-waist hugs”, or “Hugs that only last a second”.

Make no mistake: these people are looking to soul-blend. To avoid, arrive early. Lie down with closed eyes. Bring flip-flops – essential for a hasty exit.

During hard poses, women and gay men will remain silent and straight men will laugh self-deprecatingly. Imagine being at a gym. Men are lifting heavy weights. They strain, grit their teeth, sweat. But they don’t laugh. So why, here, as they sink into their thighs in Warrior Two or lift their chest skyward during Upward Facing Bow, do they feel the need to let out a little chuckle? You are witnessing an unconscious assertion of masculinity. That little laugh is their way of letting you know that hey, they’re not really embarrassed about being so bad at this, because they’re not even supposed to be here, they’re good at other things, like, for example, sitting in an airport bar working their way through a double scotch, a bowl of nuts and a Two and A Half Men re-run on the corner TV.

Of course, there is also the other type of straight guy in yoga, the guy who can wrap his arms around his ankles and turn himself into a perfect circle. Why, you ask, does this man wear his hair in a bun, on top of his head? There are some secrets that no amount of enlightenment will reveal. I will tell you this: these guys tend to get a lot of ass, so laugh as you will, but know that they’re getting the last one – upside-down.

There will be yoga overachievers. You will be doing Cat-Cow at a normal pace, and they will be bucking and heaving like mechanical bulls. You will be expending an amount of effort somewhere between “challenging yourself” and “able to retain sufficient muscle strength to remove shampoo bottle from shower caddy”. They will be straining, grunting, grimacing. Then, when class is over, and everyone does that weird little bow, the yoga overachiever will bow down for, roughly, an hour. Seriously. You will have put on your flip-flops (good job!), hightailed it away from the would-be hugger/soul-blenders, made and consumed a meal, masturbated to some violent pornography and be just about to crawl into bed, and they remain on the floor in the yoga studio, thanking God for making them, well, them.

There are teachers and students who think flexibility is some kind of indication of how good a person you are. While we certainly hold tension, trauma and rigidity in our limbs and joints and muscles, there is no reason to imagine there’s some absolutely direct correlation between how well we can move and how functional or healthy our mind is. I seriously doubt that Albert Einstein or Susan Sontag had less flexible minds than, I don’t know, Rodney Yee. My point is, some physical limitations can be aided through the practice of yoga and some can’t and no one needs the increased pressure of someone telling them, every time they strain to get their heels on the floor in Downward Facing Dog, that this is because their mind is all screwed up.

So if your teacher tells you that we hold a lot of stuff in our hips and hamstrings and as we begin to let this stuff go and become our authentic selves we will be able to wrap our arms around ourselves eight times, look around the room. You will probably see a guy who can do that, while smiling, and I’ll bet that you will eventually hear from someone in the class about the time he flew into a rage and broke a car window.

Teachers talk like Yoda’s mum. If you were to ask your yoga teacher, “Can my newly authentic hamstrings help the angry guy?” she might say something like, “That depends on whether they were coming from a space of pure intention.” The word “honour” is used a lot, as in “honouring yourself” or “honouring your practice”. Other popular words include “joy”, “integrity”, “space” (not as in outer space, as in “Go into a space of …”) and “place” (not as in “that place next to Shoe Pavilion”, as in “Let yourself come into a place of …”). When class is over, the teacher will say something like, “Bow to your inner wisdom”, or “Take a moment to thank yourself for committing to your practice”, which always makes me intone the prayer: “Please, God, make me less fat than I was an hour and a half ago.”

The worst part about yoga world vocabulary, of course, is how quickly you find yourself learning and using it. The hope is that because yoga has made you – I’m sorry, I mean, allowed you to open up a space to become – so much more self-aware and less narcissistic, you will only talk this way in front of other people who talk like that too. And now that you are friends with so many of them, because you have, after so thoroughly mocking this world basically joined it, that means practically everyone you speak to.

“How are you?” is not a simple question at yoga. No one at yoga is ever just fine. They’re “working through a lot of heavy stuff”, or “dealing with a lot of craziness”. That said, when people ask you how you are, don’t say anything bad. If you are broke, the universe is just trying to teach you a lesson about how much you already have. If someone dumped you, the universe removed that person from your life for a reason.The universe is very busy in the yoga world.

So yes, in the beginning it’s all about slipping the car keys inside the flip-flops so that all the tools of your escape are in a neat little package. But just keep showing up. In no time you will become sufficiently like all these people that they won’t bother you at all. And then some crazy asshole will make fun of you. Is the circle of eternity beautiful or what?

 Annoying? Yoga? Surely not Annoying? Yoga? Surely not

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Get Ripped Abdominals

September 2, 2011

There are a lot of fitness gurus out there ….but Mike Chang teaches you the common sense of getting fit..no secrets..he tells you how it is….he does an excellent job of explaining what needs to be done to get maximum results in shaping your body…I give this guy a thumbs up…

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

logo smaller with star Get Ripped Abdominals 

 

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Ebola: the solution may be in sight

August 28, 2011

Research in the US suggests that treatment against the deadly Ebola virus may be less than a decade away


Dr Dillner’s health dilemmas: should I give up fizzy drinks?

August 27, 2011

A glass of cola 007 Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I give up fizzy drinks?

It is a challenge for newly diagnosed diabetics to make the necessary changes in their diets to manage their acquired condition. No one likes to be told what they should or shouldn’t eat, especially after years of indulging the finer foods of life. If you are beginning to limit colories in the hope of controlling your sugar levels, a good place to start is eliminating all pop drinks (I won’t mention the brand names here…)…drink water,milk,green tea ,etc . The battle on diabetes is won by making small adjustments and avoiding those foods with a high glucose index…live longer…live happier..

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

logo smaller with star Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I give up fizzy drinks?


poweredbyguardian Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I give up fizzy drinks?This article titled “Dr Dillner’s health dilemmas: should I give up fizzy drinks?” was written by Luisa Dillner, for The Guardian on Monday 22nd August 2011 20.00 UTC

The problem

On a hot day do you reach for a cool can of Coke or a glass of water, and does it matter? Obesity (the body doesn’t seem to regulate its appetite in response to calories in drinks so the sugary drinks are extra calories), dental caries and an increase in diabetes are uncontested risks of drinking sugary fizzy drinks. Fatty livers and pancreatic cancer have also more recently been linked to a hefty intake of sugary, fizzy drinks (up to four cans a day) by researchers, but the studies are not conclusive.

Those of us watching our weight, meanwhile, may have switched to diet drinks, which contain artificial sweeteners, some many hundreds of times sweeter than natural sugars, but without the calories. Coca-Cola’s website says Diet Coke, Coke Zero and Lilt Zero contain aspartame and acesulfame-K. Slimline drinks such as Schweppes slimline Canada Dry ginger ale contain a blend of aspartame and saccharin.

The dilemma

Aspartame has been dogged by controversy ever since it was approved as a food additive over 35 years ago. A report in the Daily Mail last week said that the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is being asked to bring forward a safety review of it by members of the European parliament following a Danish study showing an increase in premature births in mothers drinking diet drinks and research showing cancer growth in mice who were fed aspartame.

The EFSA will report in 2012 instead of 2020 but has already said these recent studies have not made them change their opinion on aspartame’s safety. Yet anti-aspartame activists have long claimed it causes brain tumours, multiple sclerosis, blindness, headaches, depression and birth defects. The cause, they say, may be that the body metabolises aspartame by breaking it down to toxic substances, namely methanol and then formaldehyde (which bodies are pickled in at medical school for dissection purposes) and formic acid. But the amounts of these metabolites are small. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says you would need to drink 21 cans of diet sodas a day to approach the recommended safe limit for aspartame and its metabolites.

Aspartame has been cleared as safe in the US and Europe, but you may think there’s no smoke without fire. Some supermarkets stopped using aspartame in their own branded diet products a decade ago. If there is even a whisper of a health scare about a drink you don’t need shouldn’t you opt for a healthier, cheaper alternative such as tap water?

The solution

Don’t be scared by health scares, some of which are urban myths. We don’t absorb aspartame and, as a letter to the Lancet said in 1999, almost all the adverse reports across many websites are anecdotal. The letter pointed about that while a 330ml can of diet coke would provide 20mg of methanol, the same amount of fruit juice would yield 40mg. The FDA said that aspartame was “one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved”. The National Cancer Institute in the US says that there is no clear evidence that any of the artificial sweeteners commonly available are associated with an increased risk of cancers in humans.

But these drinks are not good for you. By drinking them you displace those with nutritional value such as milk (essential for healthy bones and teeth) and fruit juice. The UK Food Standards Agency has launched a pilot study to test individual sensitivity to aspartame. In the meantime you should avoid fizzy drinks with sugar because they have nothing to redeem them except their taste, and only drink diet ones on a limited basis.

 Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I give up fizzy drinks? Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I give up fizzy drinks?

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Fifteen minutes’ exercise a day can boost life expectancy

August 17, 2011

Exercise 007 Fifteen minutes exercise a day can boost life expectancy

Get up fom the sofa and get going on an exercise program that will help reduce overall body fat and lower that cholesterol before you begin having health problems. I am sure you can 15 minutes a day in your busy schedule. Remember before starting any sort of exercise program consult your family physician and start slowly. Take control of your health and the payoff will be a longer enjoyable life with your loved ones.

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

yepodcom2Logo1 150x150 Fifteen minutes exercise a day can boost life expectancy  


poweredbyguardian Fifteen minutes exercise a day can boost life expectancyThis article titled “Fifteen minutes’ exercise a day can boost life expectancy” was written by Maev Kennedy, for guardian.co.uk on Tuesday 16th August 2011 10.49 UTC

A cheering piece of research suggests that just 15 minutes of exercise a day – half the recommended amount in the UK – can boost life expectancy.

A study in Taiwan, reported in The Lancet, tracked more than 400,000 men and women over 12 years, and showed significant benefits from 15 minutes a day or 90 minutes a week of moderate exercise such as brisk walking. The UK government currently recommends that adults get 150 minutes of exercise a week.

The Taiwanese study found that compared with the inactive group in the study, the exercisers had a three-year longer life expectancy, and reduced their mortality risk by 14%.

Dr Chi-Pang Wen, lead author of the study, told ABC News that 30 minutes a day for five or more days a week remained the golden rule, but half that could still be very beneficial. “Finding a slot of 15 minutes is much easier than finding a 30-minute slot in most days of the week.”

The researchers also found that people who did some exercise tended to get a taste for it and do more – every additional 15 minutes reduced all cause death risks by another 4%.

England’s chief medical officer, Sally Davies, told the BBC the study would remind people there were many ways of getting exercise, “activities like walking at a good pace or digging the garden can count too”.

 Fifteen minutes exercise a day can boost life expectancy Fifteen minutes exercise a day can boost life expectancy

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Dr Dillner’s health dilemmas: should I take antioxidant supplements?

August 12, 2011

Fruit is a good source of 007 Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I take antioxidant supplements?

This controversy has been going on for years, whether or not supplements should be taken on a regular basis or simply allow our diets to be the sole determinant of our nutritional arsenal. There are many supporters and critics concerning the use and sell of nutritional supplements. Even the AMA would like to be able to control the entire vitamin industry and make the public believe that it’s solely to protect the consumer. The consumer has free will and sufficient access to research to make intelligent decisions about their health. So if you need a little extra vitamin C or D, take it knowing the safe doses.

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

yepodcom2Logo1 150x150 Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I take antioxidant supplements?    


poweredbyguardian Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I take antioxidant supplements?This article titled “Dr Dillner’s health dilemmas: should I take antioxidant supplements?” was written by Luisa Dillner, for The Guardian on Monday 8th August 2011 20.00 UTC

Antioxidants are said by many to have almost magical powers – to reduce heart disease, strokes, cancers, arthritis, degeneration of the macula in the eye (causing loss of sight), Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Last month, researchers from the Laboratory of Functional Foods in Madrid and the Linus Pauling Institute in America said antioxidants could even help people with fertility problems. But what are they? Oxidation – when a substance combines with oxygen – is a normal chemical process that occurs in our bodies, but as a byproduct it can produce free radicals – unstable molecules that can damage cells. Our bodies use antioxidants to limit the cell damage (called oxidative stress) that occurs, for example, when you’re digesting food, or exposed to smoke. Antioxidants include ascorbic acid (vitamin C), glutathione, lipoic acid, carotenes, vitamin E and coenzyme Q.

The dilemma: Antioxidants are found in a variety of fruit and vegetables (such as carrots, spinach, mushrooms, peppers, apples, oranges). But how can you be sure you’ve eaten enough, and that cooking hasn’t destroyed their ability to fight free radicals? Surely it’s better to take supplements that manufacturers say have the concentrated goodness of fruit and vegetables, without having to chew on the real things? Antioxidant supplements are taken by up to 10%of people in Europe and America, so how could they do any harm?

The solution: People who eat a fair bit of fruit and vegetables have reduced rates for heart disease and some cancers, but we don’t know for sure that it is actually the antioxidants in these foods that protect people. It would be great to be able to take a fruit or vegetable pill that reduced the risk of getting heart disease, diabetes and neurological diseases, but, of course, life is never that simple. In fact, you shouldn’t take supplements – because not only is there no good evidence they work, but there is some evidence they may be harmful.

This harm may be indirect – people who take supplements may see them as lucky charms and be cavalier with the rest of their lifestyle choices – or it may be that too many antioxidants are bad for you. The Cochrane Collaboration, an international group that sums up the evidence for health care interventions, says antioxidant supplements do more harm than good. Their review in 2007 looked at 68 trials, which included a total of over 232,000 people, looking at the effects of vitamins C, E, A or beta carotene. They found that people taking beta carotene or any of the vitamins were more likely to die during the study than those who did not.

Giving up smoking, reducing the amount of fried food you eat (frying produces free radicals that can damage cells) and regular exercise would all have more health benefits than popping supplements. But they all require effort and may be less palatable.

Laboratory research has been much more optimistic about the benefits of antioxidants than studies on real people. The researchers who said last month that antioxidants could help people with fertility studies admitted that studies on humans showed no such thing because they hadn’t been done. They had looked at animal and laboratory studies.

So rather than pay for pills, spend your money on a healthy diet that includes lots of fruit and vegetables – where there is good evidence for the health benefits.

 Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I take antioxidant supplements? Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I take antioxidant supplements?

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Mapping the body: pituitary gland

August 11, 2011

The pituitary gland circl 007 Mapping the body: pituitary gland

There’s a small gland located at the base of the brain,sitting in a small bone cavity that secretes hormones essential for hundreds of activities within the human body. When these hormones are released by the pituitary gland , they enter the blood directly. The field of medicine that deals with the disorders of glands and its treatment is called endocrinology. The pituitary gland is divided into a anterior lobe, intermediate lobe, and posterior lobe. The anterior lobe is responsible for releasing growth hormone,prolactin,ACTH,FSH,TSH, and LH. The intermediate lobe releases melanocyte-stimulating hormone that is important in determinating pigmentation of the skin. The posterior lobe releases ADH and oxytocin. The vocabulary above can be challenging for most of us but can be mastered in time, any questions should be directed to your family physician.

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

yepodcom2Logo1 150x150 Mapping the body: pituitary gland   


poweredbyguardian Mapping the body: pituitary glandThis article titled “Mapping the body: pituitary gland” was written by Gabriel Weston, for The Guardian on Monday 8th August 2011 20.00 UTC

Only once did I waver in my desire to become a surgeon; when I briefly flirted with training as an endocrinologist – a doctor specialising in hormone diseases, including those affecting the pituitary gland.

Often referred to as “the master gland” because of the crucial role it plays in regulating other hormone- producing centres, the pituitary is no bigger than a pea. It sits in a small, bony cave at the base of the skull and is connected to a part of the brain called the hypothalamus by the pituitary stalk.

During my first month as a medical student, I met a lady with a rare disease caused by a tumour of the pituitary gland, who sparked in me a temporary obsession with acromegaly. The James Bond villain Jaws has the classic symptoms of this disorder; in which too much growth hormone produces excessive growth of the body’s soft tissues.

Parts of the face enlarge and the hands and feet become giant. Such obvious deformities are matched by abnormalities of the internal organs, including the heart and bowel. Although acromegaly can, in some cases, be treated with medicine or radiotherapy, my patient ended up having her pituitary tumour removed.

The neurosurgeon worked via the nostril, gaining access to the bony cave by tunnelling through the sphenoid sinus (a bony cavity of the skull). The dangers are enormous because the gland sits among the optic nerves and the arteries supplying and draining blood from the brain; any slip of the hand could result in a patient’s immediate blindness or death.

 Mapping the body: pituitary gland Mapping the body: pituitary gland

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Dr Dillner’s health dilemmas: should I be screened for breast cancer?

August 5, 2011

BREAST CANCER SCREENING 007 Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I be screened for breast cancer?

Everyone should take their annual check-ups or screenings seriously …it may be the difference of  surviving or dying. So pick up the phone right now and ask your doctor which tests or screening you should be doing for your age group.

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

 yepodcom2Logo 150x150 Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I be screened for breast cancer?


poweredbyguardian Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I be screened for breast cancer?This article titled “Dr Dillner’s health dilemmas: should I be screened for breast cancer?” was written by Luisa Dillner, for The Guardian on Monday 1st August 2011 20.00 UTC

The dilemma: You might think this is a no-brainer: of course it’s best to find out if you have breast cancer as soon as possible. Up to one in eight women get the disease, so surely you’d want to be tested, catch it early and get treatment to improve your chances of survival? But, in fact, while screening may catch the disease early, there’s no guarantee.

Screening for diseases before they become clinically apparent is only useful if you can improve the chances of survival (or improve quality of life). To do that you need to understand what the disease would do if you left it alone – and not all diseases progress. With a type of tumour called ductal carcinoma in situ, which makes up 20% of the cancers found in breast screening, the tumour is confined to the milk ducts and there is just a 50% of chance it could develop into a full-blown cancer.

A recent study from the Nordic Cochrane Centre found that a third of cancer diagnoses made as a result of screening were not cancers. And while the NHS claims that screening saves 1,347 lives a year, Dr Klim McPherson, an Oxford professor in public health epidemiology, said in a letter to the BMJ last week that research showed that the more likely number was 500 lives a year. McPherson added that to prevent one death you would need to screen 1,000 women over 10 years. To throw even more doubt on the subject of testing, a paper in this week’s BMJ says that screening hasn’t improved mortality rates. Instead, improvements in treatment and healthcare processes were responsible for falls in death rates for breast cancer, and countries experienced the same falls whether or not they had screening.

The solution: So how can you decide if screening is for you? You may feel that one life in 1,000 could be yours and that screening is worth it. Few doctors will suggest that women should not undergo the procedure. It is a common disease and any woman who gets it would naturally wonder if she should have been screened and treated earlier.

However, a letter in the Sunday Times this week from some of the greats in cancer research argues that if women knew what the clinical evidence was they might turn down the offer of screening. It is really up to you. The mammogram is uncomfortable, no one can really say it’s going to save your life if you’re found to have breast cancer, and it may cause you unnecessary worry. I know a few doctors who have refused screening for themselves. But if you feel that if you got breast cancer and hadn’t been screened you would reproach yourself, then you should take the offer.

 Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I be screened for breast cancer? Dr Dillners health dilemmas: should I be screened for breast cancer?

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Is Your Heart on Schedule?

July 27, 2011


Let’s face it our professional jobs or responsibilities at home do not lend any benefits to cardiovascular system. So it is up to us to monitor it. Your heart is a muscle and requires maintenance in the form of physical activity that increases our heart rate way above the resting level. Keep in mind that whatever exercise program or routine you adopt, it should be one that is flexible.

Exercise Your Heart

I have four different exercising routines that I can choose from because my daily schedules change drastically from week to the next.  This will help you maintain some sort of exercise program no matter what surprising changes that may occur in your schedule. There is no excuse for not doing some exercise every day. Let’s talk about my leg routine that doesn’t require me to be in the gym. Let’s say I have no time to go to the gym and I will be stuck in the office for most of the day. I simply fall back into my most simplistic leg workout.

Here’s a Good Heart routine

I can simply do squats in my office, even while talking on the phone with a client. I will do a half squat or simply  use my chair as a guide. Begin in a standing position with your chair behind you,  lower yourself as if you were going to sit down. As soon as your buttocks touches the chair, return to a standing position. You have just completed one repetition of a squat. Now I normally do 20 repetitions per squat set. But if you are just starting, I recommend that you keep your repetitions to a maximum of 10 repetitions per set. Of course in a busy office one cannot take the time out to do several sets, but doing a set here and there throughout the day and you will be surprised of how many sets you can do at work. You will be surprised also that many people in your office will begin mimicking your routine. This is a great way to increase circulation throughout your entire body and maintaining a high level of alertness because you are delivering oxygenated blood to your brain.

A Good Heart is essential for a long life

A good heart can be only maintain by a proper exercise and diet program. So if you want to reap the rewards of a long life you will need to make the necessary adjustments in your lifestyle. If you smoke …quit ..smoking has been liked to cancer and heart disease. Eat a lot of green leafy vegetables and plenty of water.  

Do you have a simple routine you would like to share with us? If so I would like to hear about it and share it with our readers here. If you would like to submit your own article on our website please submit it to the following e-mail : yepodshoutout@gmail.com, this is Dr. Anthony from Your Educational Podcast and Video. Before beginning any exercise program, consult your primary physician.   

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

yepodcom2Logo 150x150 Is Your Heart on Schedule?

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Diabetes epidemic affects 350 million as crisis spreads to developing nations

June 25, 2011

McDonalds In India 007 Diabetes epidemic affects 350 million as crisis spreads to developing nations

Don’t wait for the symptoms to appear? Get your blood sugar levels checked to determine if you are at risk of developing diabetes….Are you watching your blood sugar levels? Make an appointment today with your physician to see if your body is controlling your sugar adequately…its a simple blood test…take control of your health today!

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

Yepod.com  


poweredbyguardian Diabetes epidemic affects 350 million as crisis spreads to developing nationsThis article titled “Diabetes epidemic affecting 350m – and western fast food is to blame” was written by Robin McKie, for The Observer on Saturday 25th June 2011 15.59 UTC

More than 350 million people in the world now have diabetes, an international study has revealed. The analysis, published online by the Lancet on Saturday, adds several tens of millions to the previous estimate of the number of diabetics and indicates that the disease has become a major global health problem.

Diabetics have inadequate blood sugar control, a condition that can lead to heart disease and strokes, as well as damage to kidneys, nerves and the retina. About three million deaths a year are attributed to diabetes and associated conditions in which blood sugar levels are disrupted.

The dramatic and disturbing increase is blamed by scientists on the spread of a western-style diet to developing nations, which is causing rising levels of obesity. Researchers also say that increased life expectancy is playing a major role.

Type 2 is the most common type of diabetes, accounting for about 85-95% of cases, and is often tied to obesity. It develops when the body fails to produce enough insulin to break down glucose, inflating blood sugar levels. Type 1 diabetes is a separate auto-immune disorder.

“Diabetes is one of the biggest causes of mortality worldwide, and our study has shown that it is becoming more common almost everywhere. It is set to become the single largest burden on world health care systems,” one of the study’s main authors, Professor Majid Ezzati, of Imperial College London, told the Observer. “Many nations are going to find it very difficult to cope with the consequences.”

This point was backed by Martin Tobias of the ministry of health in New Zealand in an accompanying editorial for the Lancet. As he states, there is “no worldwide surveillance network for diabetes, as there is for communicable diseases such as influenza”. Given the inexorable rise in case numbers that is now occurring, there was now “an urgent need” to establish proper monitoring of the disease, he added.

The study – funded by the World Health Organisation and the Gates Foundation – analysed blood from 2.7 million participants aged 25 and over from across the world over a three-year period. Doctors measured levels of glucose in their blood after they had fasted for 12 to 14 hours – blood sugar rises after a meal.

If their glucose level fell below 5.6 millimoles per litre, they were considered healthy. If their reading topped 7, they were diagnosed as having diabetes, while a result that ranged between 5.6 and 7 indicated that a person was in a pre-diabetic state. Crucially, the study found that the average global level of glucose measured this way had risen for men and women.

The team then used advanced statistical methods to estimate prevalence rates among the participants. It was estimated that the number of adults with diabetes was 347 million, more than double the 153 million estimated in 1980 and considerably higher even than a 2009 study that put the number at 285 million. “We are not saying the previous study was a bad one,” said Ezzati. “It is just that we have refined our methods a little more.”

In percentage terms, the prevalence of male adult diabetics worldwide rose from 8.3% to 9.8% in that period, with adult females increasing from 7.5% to 9.2%. As to the causes, the team attribute 70% to ageing and 30% to the increased prevalence of other factors, with obesity and body mass the most important.

It was found that in the US glucose levels had risen at more than twice the rate of western Europe over the past three decades. In wealthy nations, diabetes and glucose levels were highest in the US, Malta, New Zealand and Spain, and lowest in the Netherlands, Austria and France. Despite its obesity epidemic, the UK’s diabetes prevalence was lower than that of most other high-income countries. In a league of 27 western high-income countries, British men had the fifth lowest diabetes rates, while British women were eighth lowest.

Other badly affected countries included many Pacific island nations. As Ezzati put it: “There has been an explosion of cases there.” In the Marshall Islands, for example, one in three women and one in four men has diabetes. Saudi Arabia was also reported to have very high rates. Glucose levels were also particularly high in south Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean, central Asia, north Africa and the Middle East. The region with the lowest glucose levels was sub-Saharan Africa, followed by east and south-east Asia. Eastern Europe’s diabetes prevalence, while not low, also changed little over the three-decade period.

“Diabetes is a condition that is linked to long-term disability and we need to monitor how it is spreading very carefully or face the consequences.”

The Lancet article comes after scientists said type 2 diabetes could be reversed in as little as seven days if sufferers went on a crash diet. Adherence to a strict 600 calorie-a-day diet causes fat levels in the pancreas to plummet, restoring normal function. Professor Roy Taylor, of Newcastle University, called the discovery a “radical change” in understanding type 2 diabetes.

• This article was amended on Saturday 25 June to make clear the distinction between type 2 diabetes, which accounts for between 85-95% of cases and has been linked to lifestyle, and type 1 diabetes, which is a separate auto-immune disorder.

 Diabetes epidemic affects 350 million as crisis spreads to developing nations Diabetes epidemic affects 350 million as crisis spreads to developing nations

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Over 65s who take more than one medicine should consult their doctors

June 24, 2011

drugs Over 65s who take more than one medicine should consult their doctors

There’s a pill for every ailment that exists but we need to be careful not to take a combination of medications that could prove to be lethal. All too often an individual may have 2 or 3 doctors that may be prescribing a regiment of medications…unfortunately these doctors are not consulting with each other. Patients are also not informing their doctors of all medications being prescribed. Tell your physician about all medications you are talking…and if possible ..eliminate those that are not needed..

Pass it on,

Dr Anthony

Yepod.com   


poweredbyguardian Over 65s who take more than one medicine should consult their doctorsThis article titled “Over 65s who take more than one medicine should consult their doctors” was written by Alok Jha, science correspondent, for The Guardian on Friday 24th June 2011 06.00 UTC

The combined side-effects of commonly-used drugs can increase the risk of death and brain impairment in people over 65, according to a study of more than 13,000 people. Researchers have urged people who are taking a combination of medicines to review their intake with their doctors in light of the findings.

The study was part of the Medical Research Council’s Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies project and looked at a specific class of commonly used drugs being taken by people over 65 over a two-year period.

“The sort of drugs we’re looking at are used in allergies, depression, cardiac disease, bladder disease, pain relief and sometimes in anti-coagulation, very common drugs, some prescribed, some over the counter,” said Chris Fox, clinical senior lecturer at Norwich Medical School who led the research.

The list includes over-the-counter medicines such as Piriton and Nytol, and the anti-depressant paroxetine, used in Seroxat.

Fox rated the activity of different drugs on a messenger chemical in the brain on a three-point scale, with 0 for no effect and 3 for a severe effect. The results, published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, showed that around 20% of those people who took a regimen of drugs that scored more than 4 on the scale had died in the two years of the study, compared with only 7% of those not taking any medication in the drug class. “For every extra point scored, the odds of dying increased by 26%,” said Fox. “We found it was a cumulative risk – not just the severity of the blockade but the number of drugs as well.”

Ian Maidment, a pharmacist at Kent and Medway NHS & Social Care Partnership Trust, said that many doctors, nurses and pharmacists may not be aware that these medicines have these problems and cited overuse of drugs as one of the factors adding to the cumulative burden on people over 65. “Often you see anti-histamines, which have a high burden, for hay fever and they are continued in the depths of winter when there is snow on the ground. The problem is that someone with dementia can’t say, ‘I don’t need anti-histamine,’ so it’s continued when it’s not needed.”

Participants in the study who were taking drugs with a combined score of more than 5 also showed cognitive decline – they scored more than 4% lower in cognitive function tests compared with those who were taking no anticholinergic drugs.

“The message here is for doctors to regularly review the medication of your older patients,” said Susanne Sorensen, head of research at the Alzheimer’s Society. “The message to patients is to ask, when you’re given medication, the pharmacist if what you’re buying at the counter has any side-effects and may be bad in combination with the other drugs you take..”

Professor David Nutt, president of the British Neuroscience Association and vice-president of the European Brain Council, said that the negative effects of this class of drugs on brain and cardiac function had been known for decades and the latest study reinforced the dangers.

Dr Tim Chico, an honorary consultant cardiologist at the University of Sheffield, added that all drugs had possible side effects, but the new results should not lead anyone to stop current medications without discussing this with their doctor first. “Before starting any drug, it is important for the doctor and patient to discuss the possible benefits of the treatment, compared with the potential downsides, so that the patient can make an informed decision. As a cardiologist, many of the drugs I use (such as beta-blockers) have been definitely proven to make people with heart disease live longer, so it’s important to balance these proven benefits against the risk of side effects.”

 Over 65s who take more than one medicine should consult their doctors Over 65s who take more than one medicine should consult their doctors

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

The Beaver shows that the movies can’t cope with depression

June 20, 2011

Even Mel Gibson and a puppet that talks like Ray Winstone can’t lift unmitigated misery into big-screen magic


Dr Luisa Dillner’s guide to… donating blood

June 9, 2011

As World Blood Donor Day approaches, here’s everything you need to know


Links

  • Dr Anthony's English as a Second Language

© 2009-2012 Your Educational Podcast and Video All Rights Reserved